LOSOM - Iteration 2 Plan Eval 
2021-07-01 (Site Updated 2021-07-02)
Lake Okeechobee
% Difference relative to FWO | |||
Alternative | % Below | % Within | % Above |
NA25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
ECBr | 2.6 | 3.4 | -5.2 |
AA | -4.5 | -17.7 | 17.6 |
BB | -30.1 | -12.5 | 41.6 |
CC | -6.4 | -8.1 | 12.7 |
DD | -5.4 | 12.8 | -3.3 |
EE1 | -2.4 | -20.1 | 16.9 |
EE2 | -1.5 | -16.4 | 13.4 |
Percent difference relative to FWO (NA25) of percent of time below, within and above the Lake Okeechobee ecological stage envelope (including normal and recovery envelopes) during the period of simulation (1965 - 2016).
Caloosahatchee Estuary
Count of 14-day MA | Average Annual Discharge | ||||||||||
Alternative | <457 cfs | 457 - 750 cfs | 750 - 2100 cfs | 2100 - 2600 cfs | >2600 cfs | 2600 - 4500 cfs | 4500 - 6500 cfs | >6500 cfs | S77 Reg Q | S77 Total Q | S79 Total Q |
NA25 | 888 | 6,145 | 6,393 | 1,585 | 3,969 | 2,520 | 776 | 673 | 527.8 | 584.7 | 1293.9 |
ECBr | 6,783 | 1,571 | 4,161 | 1,692 | 4,773 | 3,174 | 886 | 713 | 514.7 | 571.2 | 1298.8 |
AA | 675 | 5,351 | 6,904 | 1,477 | 4,573 | 2,982 | 1,040 | 551 | 576.6 | 633.3 | 1342.1 |
BB | 822 | 6,098 | 7,516 | 1,222 | 3,322 | 2,084 | 569 | 669 | 408.6 | 467.2 | 1188.1 |
CC | 829 | 4,004 | 7,896 | 2,612 | 3,639 | 2,443 | 555 | 641 | 577.8 | 635.3 | 1347.4 |
DD | 739 | 5,807 | 6,965 | 898 | 4,571 | 3,133 | 843 | 595 | 516.8 | 574.3 | 1286.1 |
EE1 | 966 | 3,855 | 9,252 | 914 | 3,993 | 3,070 | 624 | 299 | 464.8 | 521.8 | 1229.6 |
EE2 | 986 | 4,177 | 8,806 | 769 | 4,242 | 3,232 | 696 | 314 | 495.4 | 552.1 | 1258.9 |
Alternative | <457 cfs | 457 - 750 cfs | 750 - 2100 cfs | 2100 - 2600 cfs | >2600 cfs | 2600 - 4500 cfs | >6500 cfs | S77 Reg Q | S77 Total Q | S79 Total Q |
NA25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
ECBr | 663.9 | -74.4 | -34.9 | 6.8 | 20.3 | 26.0 | 5.9 | -2.5 | -2.3 | 0.4 |
AA | -24.0 | -12.9 | 8.0 | -6.8 | 15.2 | 18.3 | -18.1 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 3.7 |
BB | -7.4 | -0.8 | 17.6 | -22.9 | -16.3 | -17.3 | -0.6 | -22.6 | -20.1 | -8.2 |
CC | -6.6 | -34.8 | 23.5 | 64.8 | -8.3 | -3.1 | -4.8 | 9.5 | 8.7 | 4.1 |
DD | -16.8 | -5.5 | 8.9 | -43.3 | 15.2 | 24.3 | -11.6 | -2.1 | -1.8 | -0.6 |
EE1 | 8.8 | -37.3 | 44.7 | -42.3 | 0.6 | 21.8 | -55.6 | -11.9 | -10.8 | -5.0 |
EE2 | 11.0 | -32.0 | 37.7 | -51.5 | 6.9 | 28.3 | -53.3 | -6.1 | -5.6 | -2.7 |
Radar plot of Caloosahatchee River Estuary flow categories for each alternative compared to future without (NA25) and existing condition baseline (ECBr)during the period of simulation (1965 - 2016).
Consecutive Months
The frequency of consecutive months with monthly average S79 discharge greater than 2100 cfs throughout the simulation period of record (1965 - 2016)
The frequency of consecutive months with monthly average S79 discharge greater than 2600 cfs throughout the simulation period of record (1965 - 2016)
St Lucie Estuary
Count of 14-day MA | Average Annual Discharge | ||||||
Alternative | <150 cfs | 150 - 1400 cfs | 1400 - 1700 cfs | >1700 cfs | S308 Reg Q | S308 Total Q | S80 Total Q |
NA25 | 8,654 | 9,390 | 359 | 577 | 187.4 | 195.0 | 276.5 |
ECBr | 7,277 | 10,488 | 268 | 947 | 230.6 | 246.3 | 334.5 |
AA | 13,223 | 5,548 | 15 | 194 | 48.8 | 56.3 | 130.3 |
BB | 11,308 | 5,970 | 197 | 1,505 | 226.1 | 234.1 | 316.9 |
CC | 13,213 | 5,212 | 60 | 495 | 71.7 | 79.3 | 153.4 |
DD | 10,546 | 7,934 | 321 | 179 | 144.3 | 152.0 | 230.0 |
EE1 | 12,167 | 4,658 | 265 | 1,890 | 187.3 | 194.8 | 269.2 |
EE2 | 11,513 | 7,138 | 51 | 278 | 166.3 | 173.8 | 248.7 |
Alternative | <150 cfs | 150 - 1400 cfs | 1400 - 1700 cfs | >1700 cfs | S308 Reg Q | S308 Total Q | S80 Total Q |
NA25 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
ECBr | -15.9 | 11.7 | -25.3 | 64.1 | 23.0 | 26.3 | 21.0 |
AA | 52.8 | -40.9 | -95.8 | -66.4 | -74.0 | -71.1 | -52.9 |
BB | 30.7 | -36.4 | -45.1 | 160.8 | 20.7 | 20.0 | 14.6 |
CC | 52.7 | -44.5 | -83.3 | -14.2 | -61.7 | -59.3 | -44.5 |
DD | 21.9 | -15.5 | -10.6 | -69.0 | -23.0 | -22.1 | -16.8 |
EE1 | 40.6 | -50.4 | -26.2 | 227.6 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -2.6 |
EE2 | 33.0 | -24.0 | -85.8 | -51.8 | -11.3 | -10.9 | -10.0 |
Radar plot of St Lucie Estuary flow categories for each alternative compared to future without (NA25) and existing condition baseline (ECBr)during the period of simulation (1965 - 2016).
Site content curated by SCCF and partners
Contact pjulian@sccf.org with questions